Georgia Injury Law Blog

Published on: October 31, 2011

CPSC Product Safety Database Hit with First Lawsuit – Effort to limit likelihood of Product Liability Claims

This was something that Atlanta personal injury lawyers had been expecting.Ever since the Consumer Product Safety Commission database that allows consumers to upload complaints about products went online, the attorneys at our law firm have been expecting manufacturers to challenge the manner in which the database allows consumers to publicly post complaints about products.That is exactly what has now happened.An unidentified company has filed a lawsuit to block the Consumer Product Safety Commission from posting what it describes as “baseless allegations” about one of its products.

The database in question here is located on the website saferproducts.gov.The website is operated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the establishment of the website was one of the provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.That law had been passed after a tumultuous couple of years for product safety in the country.Millions of children’s products and toys had been recalled for high lead content levels, and a number of other deficiencies.The database serves as an early identifier of products which contain defects which may result in severe personal injury or wrongful death.

The database which was launched in March this year, allows consumers to upload complaints about products.These complaints are posted online, and are publicly accessible.Other consumers can view these complaints, and make informed decisions about the products they want to buy.Consumers can post complaints about thousands of products.Manufacturers are given the opportunity to review these complaints, and post their responses.

Published on: October 30, 2011

OSHA to Fine Alpharetta, Georgia Contractor for Workplace Violations

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is likely to propose more than $55,000 in fines for an Alpharetta-based general contractor for a series of violations at a construction site in Tifton.Inspections conducted by the federal agency found that the contractor, GanawayContracting Co. Inc. of Alpharetta committed 14 safety violations. Companies with this many safety violations often face a high level of serious workers’ compensation claims.

The inspections were focused on identifying violations that increased the risk of workers suffering fall accidents in the construction industry.Overall, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited GanawayContracting Co. Inc. for repeat violations that included worker exposure to fall hazards. These type of construction accidents often result in the most significant workers’ compensation claims due to the severe personal injuries involved. Workers’ compensation attorneys have always advocated for toughpunishments of companies which repeatedly engage in unsafe practices.

Agency inspectors found that the company allowed workers to work from heights of above 15 feet without requiring any kind of fall protection, used ladders with missing or broken parts, and used ladders that did not sufficiently extend beyond the landing surface of the roof.The company also did not require workers to wear eye protection when they were performing critical tasks, like using pneumatic nail guns and electric drills.Repeat violations are issued when a company has earlier been cited for the same violations or similar violations.In this case, GanawayContracting Co. Inc. had been cited for similar violations in Alabama as well as in Oakwood, Georgia.

Published on: October 29, 2011

Workplace Safety, Profits Increase after Federal Safety Inspections – Workers’ Compensation Claims Decline

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

When the Department of Labor and Industries makes a visit to a workplace, it leads to a dramatic increase not just in workplace safety standards, but also the company’s profits.

Researchers with the Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention program used inspection data and workers’ compensation claims.The data came from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, and involved claims between 1998 and 2008.The researchers were pleasantly surprised to find that inspections by the Department of Labor and Industries automatically translated into a substantial reduction in Workers Compensation injury claims.There was also a reduction in the costs of claims after these inspection visits.These results were no surprise to workers’ compensation lawyers who have longed advocated for more frequent safety inspections.

That’s not all.The researchers also found that the greatest decrease in workers’ Workers’ Compensation claims came after an inspection resulted in a citation.The researchers found that when the inspection resulted in citations for workplace safety, there was a reduction of as much as 20% in worker injury claims, compared to work sites that were not subjected to an inspection.What’s more, the reduction in worker injury claims resulting from inspections also enhanced the company’s bottom line.

Published on: October 28, 2011

Court Holds Georgia Club Liable for Deadly Drunk Driving Accident

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

A Georgia strip club has been ordered to pay $1.75 million in damages to the family of a mother who was killed in a wrong-way crash in 2008. This past Thursday, a jury found that the club negligently over-served the drunk driver alcohol shortly before the accident. Liability of this nature falls under Georgia’s dram shop law. It was an accident that claimed his life and the lives of two others, including a young mother, Fatima Bird. While it was never determined exactly how many drinks the club patron had, reports show his blood alcohol level was nearly five times the legal limit. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution quotes attorney Trent Speckhals, of Speckhals Law, who goes so far as to say, “It’s not like someone would be unnoticeable in that condition.” Other experienced Atlanta car accident attorneys are likely to agree. With a BAC of nearly .4, there had to have been a notable loss of control over both cognitive and physical functions, which would have been obvious to the average passerby, much less to a waitress or staff members who had contact with the driver throughout the duration of his club visit.

This case again brings attention to the debate of whether “dram shops” should be held liable for failing to “take the keys” from patrons who appear to be intoxicated or have consumed one too many alcoholic beverages. And again, the jury’s response to this question seems to be a resounding yes. Originally, the term “dram shop” referred to colonial times when taverns used units of liquid measurement called drams to serve alcohol. Today, dram shop liability in Georgia means that that bars, taverns, liquor stores, and other businesses (including grocery and convenience stores) that purvey alcoholic beverages may be held liable for the damages caused by their patrons.

The Dram Shop Act and similar laws are meant to curb instances of selling alcohol to minors and to individuals who are visibly intoxicated. It appears to be a broad and far-reaching theory that reaches even into the recesses of private homes as even owners or social hosts who serve alcohol to guests at a private party, have a responsibility to avoid serving alcoholic beverages to a person who is visibly intoxicated.

Published on: October 27, 2011

New Initiative to Reduce Car Accidents caused by Drugged Drivers

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

The White House is collaborating with Mothers against Drunk Driving in a new initiative to reduce the number of fatal auto accidents caused every year by drivers under the influence of drugs.While intoxicated driving gets more than its share of attention, as personal injury attorneys have observed, the fact is that the number of car accidents involving drugged motorists has been steadily increasing. Auto accidents caused by drivers under the influence of drugs often result in severe personal injury and wrongful death.

The new initiative was launched by the National Drug Control Policy and Mothers against Drunk Driving.The partnership will increase awareness about the dangers of driving under the influence of drugs.According to Mothers against Drunk Driving, it has already launched a nationwide campaign against driving under the influence of both alcohol and drugs. MADD is also pushing for tougher law enforcement to enforce laws against driving under the influence of narcotics.The drug control policy office will also be releasing educational materials about the dangers of drugged driving, targeted at parents and teenagers.

Driving under the influence of drugs has an adverse effect on a motorist’s driving abilities.These effects are similar to the effects of intoxicated driving.A motorist’s judgment and abilities may be impacted, and his responses may be weakened.Additionally, drugs can affect a person’s motor abilities and his coordination, impacting his driving.

Published on: October 26, 2011

Trial Date Set for Pipeline Explosion Lawsuits

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

Persons who have filed personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits related to a deadly pipeline explosion in California last year that killed eight people and left dozens injured, will have to wait until July 2012 for justice.A judge in California has set a trial date for the lawsuits for July 23, 2012.Currently, there are more than 90 lawsuits that have been filed against Pacific Gas and Electric Co., the company that operated the pipeline.

Eight people died and dozens of homes were destroyed when a piece of natural gas pipeline ruptured and exploded in a section of San Bruno.The resulting flames blazed for hours, burning down homes.According to the National Transportation Safety Board, the explosion was a direct result of negligence by Pacific Gas & Electric Company.The pipeline which exploded had suffered a fracture from a partially welded seam on one section.

The pipeline had been installed in 1956, when the area was sparsely populated.However, the National Transportation Safety Board found that the pipeline did not meet the existing quality control and welding standards in 1956.The Board found that quality standards had been either overlooked by the company, or ignored.

Published on: October 25, 2011

Georgia Medical Malpractice Caps Affect Patient Rights to Compensation

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

A congressional committee, which has been convened to look at ways to trim the federal budget and reduce budget deficits, has been hearing from physician lobby groups and other representatives of the healthcare industry.According to these people, healthcare costs can be reduced by limiting damages available to patients through medical malpractice lawsuits.As any Atlanta medical malpractice lawyer will tell you, nothing could be further from the truth.Opponents of medical malpractice caps and Atlanta medical practice lawyers know that this is an old trick – raising financial concerns during these troubled economic times in order to limit patient rights to compensation after being seriously injured by medical negligence.

Medical malpractice lawsuits are an essential part of policing the conduct of doctors and other medical professionals. Just as with anyone else in our society, each medical professional should be responsible for their own conduct in causing a personal injury or wrongful death. Further, the presence of such claims forces physicians and other medical professionals to make certain they are both aware of and adhere to appropriate standards of care. In reality, approximately 5% of the physicians commit approximately 90% of the medical errors which occur. However, the medical professional has refused to revoke the medical licenses of medical doctors who are consistently negligent in their care of patients.

The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction has been considering ways to reduce budget deficits, and will be considering healthcare cutbacks as part of those measures.A number of consumer safety groups, including the Alliance for Justice, Center for Justice and Democracy, Consumer Action, Consumer Watchdog, Consumers Union, Patient Safety America, Public Citizen, and Texas Watch have written a letter to the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction.

Published on: October 24, 2011

Increased Truck Weight Limits in Georgia Could Increase Risk of Serious Injuries in Truck Accidents

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

As more and more states in the country begin to experiment with increasing weight limits for trucks in order to improve trucking efficiency, trucking companies, truck safety groups and Atlanta truck accident attorneys are watching these developments with interest.From a safety point of view, there is nothing to recommend an increase in truck weight limits, no matter how much these increase efficiency. Truck accidents are some of the most dangerous and deadly accidents on our roadways. A significant portion of these accidents result in serious personal injury and wrongful death.

Several states have authorized higher truck weight limits, allowing an increase on the weight of 18- wheelers from 80,000 pounds to 97,000 pounds.Congress is also debating such increases in weight limits.Unfortunately, during a recession, calls for increases on truck weight limits have grown louder, because of the potential benefits to the trucking industry.

According to advocates for an increase in truck weight limits, such an increase will increase efficiency and productivity, lowering the number of trips needed for transportation of cargo.According to them, higher truck weight limits may also lead to lower strain and wear and tear on highways, and reduced maintenance and repair expenses.However, the number one factor behind the trucking industry’s support of increased truck weight limits is the fact that these are expected to save the trucking industry billions of dollars every year.

Published on: October 23, 2011

NHTSA Investing in In-Car Alcohol Detection Devices to Prevent DUI Accidents

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

The threat of car accidents caused by drunk driving has declined over the past few years, but as Atlanta car accident attorneys, we know that intoxicated driving is still a major factor in auto accidents across the state. These accidents often result in severe personal injuries and wrongful death. Therefore, it is good to see that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is continuing to focus on minimizing the threat from intoxicated drivers.The agency is investing in the development of an in-car device that will help detect alcohol levels on a motorist.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investing $2.2 million in the development of the in-vehicle touch-based alcohol testing device.The agency, through the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety and the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety has invested in a company called TruTouch Technologies.This company says that it has developed the world’s first touch-based alcohol detection device that can be installed in vehicles.

The device can be used to detect alcohol on a motorist through infrared light.All that the motorist has to do is place his finger on the infrared sensor device, and the device detects alcohol levels within seconds.If the device finds that the alcohol content is beyond a specified limit, then it will disable the starter, preventing drivers from driving the car.What’s more, the device will prevent tampering with the system by recording the person’s biometric information, so that another person cannot use the device to cheat the system.

Published on: October 22, 2011

Dealing with Claims Adjusters at Insurance Companies after an Auto Accident in Georgia

by Robert N. Katz, Esq.

MSN Money has a few tips for persons involved in car accidents in Georgia.None of these tips are a surprise to Atlanta car accident lawyers, but many motorists fail to understand how doing the wrong things soon after an accident can damage their claim. Insurance companies have extremely experienced insurance adjusters who handle claims for personal injury and wrongful death. Unfortunately, a great deal of what impacts a claim for personal injury often occurs before the victim has counsel. It is during this timeframe that insurance adjusters have their greatest impact on the outcome of injury claims.

One of the first people that you will meet after an auto accident is the claims adjuster from the other driver’s insurance company or from your insurer.A claims adjuster’s job is to identify fraud in an auto accident claim.As Atlanta car accident lawyers, we often find claims adjusters trying to confuse an accident victim, by trying to get accident victims to settle as quickly as possible.Unfortunately, when a driver says or does the wrong thing after an accident, it can negatively impact the claim. In one recent case, an insurance adjuster was able to get a person with a serious spine injury to settle for an extremely small amount of money thereby eliminating his claim for future damages.

A claims adjuster may also try to fool you into comprising your claim by encouraging you to visit a “preferred repair shop. “ Often, these repair shops will underestimate the damage to your car or fail to have the vehicle properly repaired because they are endeavoring to lower the cost to the insurer. Each person who has been in an accident has a right to go to the repair shop of his or her choice.